Factors affecting the understanding and retention of the informed consent among participants at an antiretroviral clinical trial in a resource limited setting
نویسنده
چکیده
The misunderstanding of the informed consent has become a major area of concern particularly for participants of clinical trials in the developing regions/countries. This study assessed the understanding and retention of the informed consent among participants in an anti-retroviral clinical trial been conducted in Nigeria; and also the myriad of social, cultural & economical factors affecting their understanding. A structured questionnaire (QuIC) was administered to participants who signed consent to the lopinavir/ritonavir mono-therapy study, within the previous 12 months. The questionnaire assesses re-call of the basic elements of informed consent specified in federal regulations. A total of 55 respondents completed the QuIC questionnaire. Majority age distribution was in the 30-49 age group (69.1%), 10.9% had no education, 32.7% were not employed, 69.1% were females. 74.5% didn’t know that the treatments and procedures in the clinical trial are not standard for their HIV management; 18.2% of respondents didn’t know that the trial carried additional risks and discomfort in comparison to standard treatments; 38.2% were unsure if they were offered alternatives to participation; 32.7% were unsure as to who will pay for treatment if they were injured or become ill as a result of participation in this clinical trial. None of the demographics were significantly associated with knowledge scores. In the uni-variate model, none of the socioeconomic factors were independently associated with improved knowledge score. Results suggest misunderstanding/deficiencies in certain important domain areas. This study reiterates the need for intensive studies in the area of therapeutic misconception as it has to do with HIV/AIDS preventive trials in developing countries.
منابع مشابه
How informed is consent in vulnerable populations? Experience using a continuous consent process during the MDP301 vaginal microbicide trial in Mwanza, Tanzania
BACKGROUND HIV prevention trials conducted among disadvantaged vulnerable at-risk populations in developing countries present unique ethical dilemmas. A key concern in bioethics is the validity of informed consent for trial participation obtained from research subjects in such settings. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a continuous informed consent process adopt...
متن کاملA Comparison of the Quality of Informed Consent for Clinical Trials of an Experimental Hookworm Vaccine Conducted in Developed and Developing Countries
Informed consent is one of the principal ethical requirements of conducting clinical research, regardless of the study setting. Breaches in the quality of the informed consent process are frequently described in reference to clinical trials conducted in developing countries, due to low levels of formal education, a lack of familiarity with biomedical research, and limited access to health servi...
متن کاملIntroducing New Priority Setting and Resource Allocation Processes in a Canadian Healthcare Organization: A Case Study Analysis Informed by Multiple Streams Theory
Background In this article, we analyze one case instance of how proposals for change to the priority setting and resource allocation (PSRA) processes at a Canadian healthcare institution reached the decision agenda of the organization’s senior leadership. We adopt key concepts from an established policy studies framework – Kingdon’s multiple streams theory – to inform our analysis. Methods Tw...
متن کاملQuality of informed consent: measuring understanding among participants in oncology clinical trials.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To describe newly enrolled clinical trial subjects' knowledge and understanding of the oncology clinical trials in which they were participating. DESIGN Descriptive, correlational. SETTING The oncology center of a small community hospital in New England. SAMPLE 8 patients who consented to enroll in oncology clinical trials. METHODS The Quality of Informed Consent ques...
متن کاملCluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting
BACKGROUND Maximizing comprehension is a major challenge for informed consent processes in low-literacy and resource-limited settings. Application of rapid qualitative assessments to improve the informed consent process is increasingly considered useful. This study assessed the effects of Rapid Ethical Assessment (REA) on comprehension, retention and quality of the informed consent process. M...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 14 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013